{"id":340,"date":"2026-10-07T14:48:51","date_gmt":"2026-10-07T12:48:51","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ice26.eposter.civired.com\/?post_type=portfolio&#038;p=340"},"modified":"2026-10-09T10:43:46","modified_gmt":"2026-10-09T08:43:46","slug":"evaluating-the-quality-and-readability-of-patient-information-available-for-cystoscopies-human-versus-generative-artificial-intelligence-comparison-of-resources-and-quality-measurements-a-b","status":"publish","type":"portfolio","link":"https:\/\/ice26.eposter.civired.com\/en\/portfolio\/evaluating-the-quality-and-readability-of-patient-information-available-for-cystoscopies-human-versus-generative-artificial-intelligence-comparison-of-resources-and-quality-measurements-a-b\/","title":{"rendered":"UP149 &#8211; Evaluating the Quality and Readability of Patient Information Available for Cystoscopies: Human versus Generative Artificial Intelligence Comparison of Resources and Quality Measurements \u2013 A Benchmarking Study from EAU Endourology."},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Introduction &amp; Objectives<br \/>\nCystoscopy is routinely used for diagnostic or therapeutic purposes. With a rising global incidence of bladder and prostate<br \/>\npathologies, cystoscopies are now a standard procedure performed for a larger proportion of the population. Advances in information<br \/>\ntechnology have led to a shift in how people access information, with increased use of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI). We<br \/>\naimed to evaluate the quality and readability of traditional websites and GAI-generated leaflets as resources for patients and<br \/>\ncaregivers seeking information about cystoscopies.<br \/>\nMaterials &amp; Methods<br \/>\nThe top 20 results from four search terms across three search engines\u2014Google, Yahoo, and Bing-were collated, with duplicates<br \/>\nexcluded. Prompts were entered into GAI platforms, including ChatGPT, Gemini, and DeepSeek, to produce patient information<br \/>\nleaflets. These sources were then assessed by two authors for quality using the DISCERN and JAMA Benchmark scores, and for<br \/>\nreadability using the Flesch Reading Ease Score (FRES) and the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL). Additionally, ChatGPT was<br \/>\nasked to evaluate the quality of both websites and GAI leaflets using the DISCERN score.<br \/>\nResults<br \/>\n81 websites were included after appropriate exclusions. The DISCERN scores were 50.8 (\u00b17.89) and 52.7 (\u00b15.03); the JAMA<br \/>\nBenchmark was 2.19 (\u00b11.21) and 1 (\u00b10); FRES was 56.3 (\u00b19.31) and 54.3 (\u00b19.82); and FKGL was 8.21 (\u00b11.71) and 8.5 (\u00b11.39) for<br \/>\nwebsites and GAI leaflets, respectively. Comparisons between websites and GAI leaflets showed no significant differences in<br \/>\nDISCERN scores (p=0.653), JAMA Benchmark (p=0.0574), FRES (p=0.729), and FKGL (p=0.627). A Wilcoxon Signed Rank test<br \/>\nrevealed significant differences between the author and GAI-reported DISCERN scores (p&lt;0.0001).<\/p>\n<p>Conclusions<br \/>\nAs demand for bedside cystoscopies increases, the information provided before and after the procedure must be of high quality and<br \/>\neasy to understand. Our study reveals shortcomings in both the quality and readability of online resources and GAI leaflets. To help<br \/>\npatients better understand the procedure and handle post-procedural side effects, organisations and individuals need to improve the<br \/>\nquality and clarity of the available information. This will enable patients to cope more effectively and enhance the physician-patient<br \/>\nrelationship.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Introduction &amp; Objectives Cystoscopy is routinely used for diagnostic or therapeutic purposes. With a rising global incidence of bladder and prostate pathologies, cystoscopies are now a standard procedure performed for a larger proportion of the population. Advances in information technology &hellip; <a class=\"kt-excerpt-readmore\" href=\"https:\/\/ice26.eposter.civired.com\/en\/portfolio\/evaluating-the-quality-and-readability-of-patient-information-available-for-cystoscopies-human-versus-generative-artificial-intelligence-comparison-of-resources-and-quality-measurements-a-b\/\" aria-label=\"UP149 &#8211; Evaluating the Quality and Readability of Patient Information Available for Cystoscopies: Human versus Generative Artificial Intelligence Comparison of Resources and Quality Measurements \u2013 A Benchmarking Study from EAU Endourology.\">read more<\/a><\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":341,"menu_order":0,"template":"","meta":{"_acf_changed":false},"portfolio-type":[17],"portfolio-tag":[],"class_list":["post-340","portfolio","type-portfolio","status-publish","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","portfolio-type-highlight-session-1"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ice26.eposter.civired.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/portfolio\/340","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ice26.eposter.civired.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/portfolio"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ice26.eposter.civired.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/portfolio"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ice26.eposter.civired.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ice26.eposter.civired.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/341"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ice26.eposter.civired.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=340"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"portfolio-type","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ice26.eposter.civired.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/portfolio-type?post=340"},{"taxonomy":"portfolio-tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ice26.eposter.civired.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/portfolio-tag?post=340"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}